2850 Presidential Dr.
Suite 160
Fairborn, OH 45324

Phone: (937) 426-9270
Fax: (937) 426-9271

help@bioforensics.com

FB Logo
Forensic Bioinformatics

8th Annual Conference
The Science of DNA Profiling:
A National Expert Forum

October 10-11, 2009

Las Vegas Marriott


About the Conference
The conference is primarily intended to be an opportunity for experts and attorneys familiar with forensic DNA profiling to exchange information and insights. Less experienced attorneys learn what issues may be important to criminal cases they are litigating as well as to determine which resources and experts are best suited to assist them. There are no admission restrictions.

Over a period of two days, the seminar will cover subjects germane to forensic DNA including: evidence collection, quality assurance, validation of laboratory procedures, transfer, identification, technical artifacts and error, juror comprehension, expert witness selection and due diligence. Course materials consisting of speaker presentations and supporting references such as key literature, legal documents and web sites will be provided to each participant in electronic format at the beginning of the seminar. Written course evaluations will be solicited from all participants.



Course Speakers
The course will mainly be headed by Christine Funk, Simon Ford, and Carrie Rowland.

Christine Funk is a criminal defense attorney and adjunct professor at William Mitchell College of Law. She has been a criminal defense attorney for over 12 years, has been dealing with forensic DNA issues in the courtroom for almost as long. Funk has been with the public defender's office her entire career. Her current job with the State of Minnesota's Public Defender's Office is to handle and/or assist other attorneys with complex litigation. She also focuses on forensic issues for the office, including DNA evidence as well as other scientific disciplines in the courtroom. Christine Funk has presented DNA education to lawyers and lay persons across the country. Christine.Funk@state.mn.us

Simon Ford, Ph.D. is the principal of Lexigen Science and Law Consultants, Inc., in San Francisco. Born in England, Dr. Ford holds a Ph.D. degree in Biochemistry from the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom, and a Bachelor of Science degree in Genetics from the University of Leeds, also in the United Kingdom. He has been working with DNA for twenty-five years as a researcher, teacher, writer, and consultant, specializing in forensic and environmental applications of DNA technology. Simon has worked as a consultant in several hundred cases involving DNA evidence, and his related consulting work has been his primary means of support for over a decade. ford@bioforensics.com

Carolyn Rowland, M.S., Mrs. Rowland is currently an analyst at Forensic Bioinformatics, Inc. in where she reviews case files (including Genophiler output, laboratory notes and serological results) associated with forensic DNA testing. She has reviewed and consulted with the lead attorneys of more than 800 cases over the past seven years. rowland@bioforensics.com



Schedule

Saturday, October 10th - Sunday, October 11th


Opening remarks.

Part 1: DNA for attorneys: Are you kidding me?

Part 2: Taking the next step: Wading into the gene pool.

Part 3: Biology basics.

Part 4: Numbers? Is this math? Understanding the significance of the numbers.

Part 5: Evidence collection: How the DNA gets into the lab...

Part 6: Discerning the ‘Ultimate Meaning’

Part 7: How does the lab get the blood off the shoes...

Part 8: How they make a scrimillion copies of the DNA

Part 9: Statistics

Part 10: Things that can muck up a DNA Profile

Part 11: The unexpected results file

Part 12: Validation studies and the lawyer



Christine Funk's DNA basic discovery request



CLE Credit
CLE accreditation is pending. Please let us know if you'd like to apply for credit.


Location
The conference is located at the Las Vegas Marriott

325 Convention Center Drive
Las Vegas, Nevada 89109
Phone: 1-702-650-2000

http://www.marriott.com/hotels/travel/lasst-las-vegas-marriott/



Questions?
Contact Carrie Rowland through e-mail or call Forensic Bioinformatics at (937) 426-9270.


Course materials
Please check back as we will be adding more materials in the future.

  • W Thompson, S Ford, T Doom, M Raymer, and D Krane. Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: Essential elements of a competent defense review. Part 1. The Champion. 27(3):16-25, April 2003.

  • W Thompson, S Ford, T Doom, M Raymer, and D Krane. Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: Essential elements of a competent defense review. Part 2. The Champion. 27(4):24-28, May 2003.

  • Useful chart of DNA terms, information on commonly-used testing kits, how to identify some specific problems with DNA evidence, and twelve important questions that always need to be asked about DNA evidence.

  • William Thompson and Dan Krane. Chapter 11: DNA in the courtroom. Psychological and Scientific Evidence in Criminal Trials. West Group. 2003.

  • William C. Thompson. Tarnish on the 'gold standard:' Understanding recent problems in forensic DNA testing. The Champion. 30(1):10-16, January/February 2006.

  • William A. Tobin and William C. Thompson. Evaluating and challenging forensic identification evidence. The Champion. 30(6):12-21, July 2006.

  • National Research Council. Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward. Washington DC, National Academy Press: 2009. (On-line)

  • National Research Council. The Evaluation of Forensic DNA Evidence. Washington DC, National Academy Press: 1996. (On-line)

  • National Research Council. DNA Technology in Forensic Science. Washington DC, National Academy Press: 1992. (On-line)

  • D. Krane, S. Ford, J. Gilder, K. Inman, A. Jamieson, R. Koppl, I. Kornfield, D. Risinger, N. Rudin, M. Taylor, W.C. Thompson. Sequential unmasking: A means of minimizing observer effects in forensic DNA interpretation. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2008;53(4):1006-7. Response - Author's Response

  • B. Budowle, A.J. Eisenberg, A. van Daal. Validity of low copy number typing and applications to forensic science. Croatian Medical Journal. 2009;50(3):207-217.

  • B. Caddy, G.R. Taylor, and A.M.T. Linacre. A Review of the Science of Low Template DNA Analysis. April 2008.

  • Justice Weir. The Queen v. Sean Hoey. Crown Court sitting in Northern Ireland. Bill No: 341/05. Neutral citation no. [2007] NICC 49. Ref: WEI7021. December 20, 2007.

  • J. Gilder, T. Doom, K. Inman, and D. Krane. Run-specific limits of detection and quantitation for STR-based DNA testing. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2007;52(1):97-101.

  • Keith Devlin. Scientific heat about cold hits. Unfinished draft. 2007.

  • F.R. Bieber, C.H. Brenner, D. Lazer. Finding criminals through DNA of their relatives. Science. 2006; 312:1315-1316.

  • D. Paoletti, T. Doom, M. Raymer, and D. Krane. Assessing the implications for close relatives in the event of similar but non-matching DNA profiles. Jurimetrics. 2006;46(2):161-175.

  • C. Rowland, R. Van Trees, M. Taylor, and D. Krane. Was the Shawnee war chief Blue Jacket a Caucasian? The Ohio Journal of Science. 2006;106(4):126-129.

  • Inquest into the death of Jaidyn Raymond Leskie   Coroners Case Number: 007/98. October 2006.

  • Dan E. Krane. Victoria State Coroner's Inquest into the Death of Jaidyn Leskie. DNA report. December 4, 2003.

  • D. Paoletti, T. Doom, C. Krane, M. Raymer, and D. Krane. Empirical analysis of the STR profiles resulting from conceptual mixtures. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2005;50(6):1361-1366.

  • J. Gilder, S. Ford, T. Doom, M. Raymer, and D. Krane. Systematic differences in electropherogram peak heights reported by different version of the GeneScan® software. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2004;49(1):85-92.

  • D. Risinger and M. Saks. A house with no foundation: forensic science needs to build a base of rigerous research to establish its reliability. Issues in Science and Technology. Fall 2003.

  • A. Nance and S. Morris. Jury Understanding of DNA Evidence: An Empirical Assessment of Presentation Formats for Trace Evidence with a Relatively Small Random Match Probability. October 17, 2003.

  • M. Taylor and E. Johnson. TA case #1458, Commonwealth v. Dirk K. Geineder. Mixture studies report.

  • E. Kafarowski, A. Lyon, and M. Sloan. The retention and transfer of spermatozoa in clothing by machine washing. Canadian Society of Forensic Science Journal, 20(1):7.11, 1996.

  • Stanley Sawyer, Ann Podleski, Dan Krane, and Daniel Hartl. DNA Fingerprinting Loci Do Show Population Differences: Comments on Budlowe et al. American Journal of Human Genetics. 1996;59:272-274.

  • Ronald Ostrowski and Dan E. Krane. Unresolved Issues in the Forensic Use of DNA Profiling. Accountability in Research. 1993;3:47-54.

  • Dan E. Krane, Robert W. Allen, Stanley A. Sawyer, Dmitri A. Petrov, and Daniel L. Hartl. Genetic Differences at Four DNA Typing Loci in Finnish, Italian, and Mixed Caucasian Populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - USA (Genetics). 1992;89:10583-10587.


    Questions? Contact help@bioforensics.com.

    Last modified: 03/12/10