Welcome to the 6th annual Forensic Bioinformatics Conference

The Science of DNA Profiling: A National Expert Forum

English geneticist Alec Jeffreys first described a method for “typing” human DNA in 1985. Since that time, DNA typing technology has advanced rapidly and the new DNA tests have been embraced eagerly by the criminal justice system. DNA tests are now routinely used to help identify the source of blood, semen, hair and other biological materials found at crime scenes and to establish family relationships in cases of disputed parentage. DNA tests have helped prosecutors obtain convictions in thousands of cases and have helped establish the innocence of thousands of individuals who might otherwise have become suspects.

Though it has been invaluable to the justice system, DNA evidence has the potential to be tremendously misleading in some cases. DNA tests can be botched, misinterpreted, mischaracterized and misunderstood. Cases have come to light in which innocent people were convicted based on bad DNA evidence. Controversy continues over how to assure the reliability of DNA tests and how to describe the statistical significance of test results. The issues lawyers face when dealing with DNA evidence can be extraordinarily complex and confusing.

Materials

John Buckleton. Good forensic science. Powerpoint presentation. Millennium Conference in London, October 1999.

John Buckleton. What Can The 90's Teach Us About Good Forensic Science. Millennium Conference in London, October 1999.

James Crow. DNA forensics: past, present, and future. The 10th International Symposium on Human Identification. 2000.

Dan Krane and Michael Raymer. Chapter 1: Molecular biology and biological chemistry. Fundamentals Concepts of Bioinformatics. Pearson Benjamin Cummings. 2003.

W Thompson, S Ford, T Doom, M Raymer, and D Krane. Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: Essential elements of a competent defense review. Part 1. The Champion, 27(3):16-25, April 2003.

W Thompson, S Ford, T Doom, M Raymer, and D Krane. Evaluating forensic DNA evidence: Essential elements of a competent defense review. Part 2. The Champion, 27(4):24-28, May 2003.

William Thompson and Dan Krane. Chapter 11: DNA in the courtroom. Psychological and Scientific Evidence in Criminal Trials. West Group. 2003.

William C. Thompson. Tarnish on the 'gold standard:' Understanding recent problems in forensic DNA testing .  The Champion, 30(1):10-16, January/February 2006.

William A. Tobin and William C. Thompson. Evaluating and challenging forensic identification evidence .  The Champion, 30(6):12-21, July 2006.

DNA discovery motion. Microsoft Word format.

DNA discovery motion. Wordperfect format.

Last modified: 03/12/10