New findings on jurors’ evaluations of forensic science (Dr. William C. Thompson, University of California, Irvine)

Materials

Presentation

Kaasa SO, Peterson T, Morris EK, Thompson WC. Statistical inference and forensic evidence: Evaluating a bullet lead match. Law and Human Behavior. December 2006.

Koehler JJ, Thompson WC. Mock jurors' reactions to selective presentation of evidence from multiple-opportunity searches. Law and Human Behavior. 2006;30:455-468.

Thompson WC, Cole SA. Psychological aspects of forensic identification evidence. n Mark Costanzo, Daniel Krauss, & Kathy Pezdek (eds.), Expert Psychological Testimony for the Courts (Erlbaum, 2007), pp. 31-68.

Thompson WC, Taroni F, Aitken CGG. How the probability of a false positive affects the value of DNA evidence. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2003;48(1).

Thompson WC, Dioso-Villa R. Turning a blind eye to misleading scientific testimony: Failure of procedural safeguards in a capital case. Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology. 2007.

Tobin WA, Thompson WC. Evaluating and challenging forensic identification evidence. The Champion. July 2006:12-21.